Skip to Main Content

Priorities

  • Education Clearing pathways to a meaningful education
  • Environmental Justice Strengthening the symbiosis between humanity and nature
  • Health Accelerating cancer research and empowering patients
  • Immigration Helping aspiring Americans and new immigrants succeed
  • Media & Journalism Provoking thought and strengthening democracy
  • Social Justice Elevating leaders and models at the forefront of change
  • Bloomhouse Co-creating a thriving East Palo Alto with the community
  • Chicago CRED Creating real economic destiny in Chicago
  • E Pluribus Unum Building a more just, equitable, and inclusive South
  • XQ: The Super School Project Rethinking America's high schools

About Emerson

  • About Us A letter from Laurene Powell Jobs
  • Our Team
  • Our Fellowships Amplifying extraordinary voices
  • Stay Informed

Share this page

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin

Are Immigrant Detention Centers the New Internment Camps?

Immigration

Posted October 2015

Agatha Bacelar

Emerson Collective Senior Fellow Barbara Hines has spent the last 40 years providing legal representation for people who have fled violence and persecution. A former professor and director of the immigration clinic at the University of Texas at Austin, Hines is a leading advocate in the fight to end family detention—the controversial practice of incarcerating refugees in jail-like conditions while they await immigration hearings.

Over the past year, Hines’ work has taken her to the remote towns of Karnes City and Dilley, Texas, home to two of three new family detention centers in the United States built to hold more than 2,000 mothers and children. Most of these detainees are fleeing an explosion of violence in Central America, where gangs have overtaken police forces and homicide rates are among the highest in the world.

The heavy costs of family detention at Karnes and Dilley are borne by refugees and taxpayers alike. Detained women work four hours a day for just $1 an hour at these facilities, which are run by the for-profit prison corporation GEO Group. For children—many of whom are malnourished and lack access to proper medical treatment—the physical and emotional toll of incarceration may exact a cost for the rest of their lives, as developmental milestones are delayed or disrupted.

For U.S. taxpayers, the cost of detaining an individual at Dilley runs higher than $300 per day. Effective alternatives to detention, such as community case management systems that link immigrants to lawyers and social services, are far less expensive and significantly more humane. Unfortunately, case management for released families is currently administered by GEO Group—the same corporation that runs the government’s detention centers—which offers families neither community contacts nor connections to vital services.

With the debate over immigration reform stalled in Washington, Hines and her colleagues are on the front lines, serving families trapped in what can only be described as a new generation of internment camps. Hines recently took us to Karnes, Texas to meet some of these women and children and to hear about the conditions they are enduring in the struggle for a better life.

What next?

  • Watch a video explainer about the Central American refugee crisis.
  • Read more to understand why families are fleeing.
  • Understand the impact family detention has on children.

Connected Stories

  • The Cost of Citizenship Denied

    This series examines how our failure to acknowledge and accommodate 11 million undocumented Americans has far-reaching consequences.

    Immigration
  • Scapegoating Undocumented Immigrants Threatens Our Democracy

    Justifying voter suppression by falsely claiming that undocumented immigrants commit voter fraud disenfranchises citizens of color; unconstitutional efforts to depress immigrants’ participation in the census undercounts entire communities.

    Immigration, and Social Justice
  • Undocumented and Uninsured

    Healthcare in the United States has largely been treated as a privilege reserved for citizens who could afford it; in most states, undocumented immigrants are unilaterally excluded. But individual exclusion has a collective cost.

    Health, and Immigration

From Our Network

  • Terminating DACA during the pandemic would be a callous error in judgment

    Writing in The Washington Post Laurene Powell Jobs recognizes the critical role of health-care workers — and more than 200,000 other Dreamers in occupations deemed essential — underscores the stakes of the Supreme Court’s imminent decision on DACA.

    The Washington Post

Stay Informed

Join our mailing list and follow us on social.

Email address is not valid. Email addresses should follow the format user@domain.com and must originate from a valid domain.

You may unsubscribe at any time. By submitting information, you accept our Privacy Policy.

  • facebook
  • twitter
  • instagram
  • linkedin

Copyright © 2021 Emerson Collective

  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Unsolicited Submission Policy
  • Fraudulent Requests